Peer Review

    The papers edited in Microsoft Word will be sent by e-mail to the , chief editors, as an attachment. Received documents will be first analyzed as to the subject and size.
These have to fit in the magazine theme and match with the format required. The inappropriate articles will be send back to the authors.

     In the second stage, the works that fall under the theme of the magazine are checked with the antiplagiarism software.

     The works that fulfill all conditions requiered are sent to two independent scientific referees for evaluation article. Author's identity is not disclosed to reviewers. Evaluators transmit to the chief editor their opinion on the scientific content of the paper.
The chief editor will summarize reviewer comments and he will communicate them to the author.

     If reviewers have contrary opinions, the editor may submit the work to a third reviewer. Then, taking into account the views of the reviewers, the editor decides as to the acceptance / acceptance with corrections / work rejection and conveys the author's decision.
     For accepted papers, authors submit a written statement that emphasizes that all data and the results are real and original, and the work has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Along with sending the manuscript, the authors agree the copyright for their article to be transferred to the publisher when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprinting, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic documents or any other reproductions of similar nature and translations.

DATES IMPORTANTES – NEW!
Date limite pour la soumission des articles: 23 Avril 2015

Notification d'acceptation des communications: 4 Mai 2015

Liens utiles